Teplizza

Don't trust your memory. Trust Teplizza
  • About
  • Tools
    • Mood Check
    • Break the ice
      • 3 Things in 3 Minutes
      • Team Contract
      • Team Manifesto
      • Team Name / Team Poster
      • Trading Cards
      • Uniqueness Share
      • Whose Life Is It Anyway?
      • Worst/Best team vision
    • Tools for opening
      • Altitude
      • Graphic Jam
      • Pie Chart Agenda
      • Squiggle Birds
    • Team collaboration
      • Campfire
      • Market of Skills
      • Team Spectrograph
    • Generating insights / Brainstorming
      • 1-2-4-All
      • 3-12-3 Brainstorm
      • 6-8-5
      • Back of the Napkin
      • Brainstorms
      • Carousel
      • Challenge Cards
      • Heuristic Ideation Technique
      • How-Now-Wow Matrix
      • Image-ination
      • Make A World
      • Memory Wall
      • Post-Up with FOG
      • Pre-mortem (kick-off)
      • Product Pinocchio
      • SQUID
      • Storyboard
      • The Anti-Problem
    • Prioritizing
      • 20/20 Vision
      • 35
      • Card Sort
      • Forced Ranking
      • NUF Test
    • Tools for Retrospectives
      • Comment Cards
      • Pictionary
      • Plus/Delta
      • Return of time invest
      • Sailboat
      • Team Radar
      • The 12 Principle Ice breaker
      • The CAPT activity – Confident or Aprehansive X People or Tech
      • The world cafe
      • Two Trues One Lie
      • Value grid
    • Futurespectives
      • Draw Nirvana
      • Future Facebook Posts
      • Predicting The Weather
    • Giving Feedback
      • Empathy Map
      • Feedback Day
      • Give a feedback in right way
      • Heart, Hand, Mind
    • Warm-up
      • Командный рисовальщик
      • Нити управления
      • Тимбаланс
      • Collaborative face drawing
      • Find your pair
      • Lift Ball
      • Quick Decisions
      • Step In: Step Out – using comfort zones
      • The Learning Environment
      • WHY… BECAUSE…
      • Командный лабиринт
    • Vizualizing
      • Personas
      • Product Canvas
      • Product Vision Board
      • Storyboards
    • Management 3.0 tools
      • Celebrating grids and Yay questions
      • Culture Book
      • Delegation poker
      • Improv Cards and Storytelling
      • Kudo
      • Merit Money
      • Moving Motivators
      • Scoreboard Index
      • Team Competency Matrix
      • Value stories and culture books
    • Facilitation Guide
      • Fishbowl
    • Buddy System
    • Project Jeopardy

Forced Ranking

  • Home
  • /
  • Tools
  • /
  • Prioritizing
  • /
  • Forced Ranking

Object of Play

When prioritizing, a group may need to agree on a single, ranked list of items. Forced ranking obligates the group to make difficult decisions, and each item is ranked relative to the others. This is an important step in making decisions on items like investments, business priorities, and features or requirements—wherever a clear, prioritized list is needed.

Number of Players: Small group of 3–10 participants

Duration of Play: Medium to long; 30 minutes to 1 hour depending on the length of the list, the criteria, and the size of the group

How to Play

To set up the game, participants need to have two things: an unranked list of items and the criteria for ranking them. Because forced ranking makes the group judge items closely, the criteria should be as clear as possible. For example, in ranking features for a product, the criteria might be “Most important features for User X.” In the case of developing business priorities, the criteria might be “Most potential impact over the next year.”

If there are multiple dimensions to a ranking, it is best to rank the items separately for each criterion, and then combine the scores to determine the final ranking. It is difficult for participants to weigh more than one criterion at a time, as in the confusing “Most potential impact over the next year and least amount of effort over the next six months.”

In this case, it would be best to rank items twice: once by impact and once by effort. Although there is no hard limit on the number of items to be ranked, in a small-group setting the ideal length of a list is about 10 items. This allows participants to judge items relative to one another without becoming overwhelming. By making the entire list visible on a flip chart or whiteboard, participants will have an easier time ranking a larger list.

To play, create a matrix of items and the criteria. Each participant ranks the items by assigning it a number, with the most important item being #1, the second most important item as #2, and so forth, to the least important item. Because the ranking is “forced,” no items can receive equal weight.

Once the items have been ranked, tally them and discuss the prioritized list and next steps

Previous Story
Next Story

Search

About This Site

Teplizza is about people, not about tools or process.

Find your way how to know more about your people using different tools that are gathered here.

Powered By Impressive Business WordPress Theme